the 2.0

I've just realized that some people might think that my covs2.0 is an homage to Brotherhood2.0, but that wasn't my intention. In fact I didn't think of that connection until a friend mentioned it. My 2.0 was meant to reference the discussions in the world of the library of Library2.0 and Web2.0, which I understand to be the upgrades of these systems into the rest of the world.

Here I am in this class using a Wiki regularly, reading blog posts, discussing servers and FTP...all under the guise of the library! In some ways, it makes me feel really lucky that I decided to become a librarian now, because I am beginning to understand that this "upgrade" is here to stay and so we must alter the way we think about libraries and reconsider what it means to research, to locate information, and to serve patrons.

In all this new technology (and even the old stuff), I still can't get my head around some of it. I can't quite figure out what to do with the "public" aspects of so much of it. If I make a del.icio.us page for my teachers and students, would I need to reconsider what I have on my own, if perchance they found mine? My name is out there now in the blogosphere and interweb. Does 2.0 mean more individual exposure? If so, are we always aware of what image we put out? It makes me think that more of us (but especially schools and libraries and libraries in schools) need publicists. Perhaps social networking is a type of backlash toward the society pages of the 40s, 50s, and 60's. Now there's a thesis for someone? Is social networking more than a society page upgrade?